The Moral Issues of Freenet and Online File Sharing :: Internet Technology Computers Essays

The Moral Issues of thawnet and Online File Sharing The internet today is a vast network that contains nearly limitless kernels of information and media. With this immense amount of data at our fingertips, the line between ripe and wrong has begun to blur. The mislabeled downloading of copyrighted material has exploded in recent years, but a larger issue looms over the currentcopyrighting frenzy. It is that of the preservation of free manner of speaking in cyberspace. Should the government be allowed to limit our access to unsuitable pith? And to what degree? These be not easy questions to answer, nor should they be. Similar questions have been raised(a) throughout recital. Freenet is a program that has been developed to provide an answer to the same question with a definite no. The following quiz leave explain what Freenet is and how it fits into the free speech debate and future of the internet. In this essay I ordain discuss the followingA quick history of free sp eech on the InternetAn explanation of FreenetHow Freenet functionsFreenets role in the future progression of the digital ageThe illegal usage of Freenet Free Speech and the InternetThe first amendment to the constitution reads Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Constitution) We as Americans have the right to speak our minds. We are able to criticize the government and voice our opinions in the form of voting and political debate. This is not only a right, it is critical for the survival of our country. The internet is no stranger to free speech debates. In early 1996 the Communications Decency Act was passed. This act prevented indecent and patently crime content which included profanity and many works of classic literary productions that contain ed such material. No less than 6 months later, the CDA was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In 1997 the Supreme Court granted the Internet plenteous protection under the 1 amendment entitling it the same freedoms of print media. Two sides are now battling on a new front the abuse of 1 amendment in cyber space through the exchange of illegal material. I will discuss this issue in more detail later.