Sunday, April 7, 2019

Does Internet Enhance or Reduce Social Interaction Essay Example for Free

Does Internet Enhance or Reduce Social Interaction EssayPapers like HomeNet publications beget been following the effects, decreed or electronegative of Internet on its mappingrs. The f wholly outings ar interesting as it reports both demonstrable and negative results. Initi completelyy the effect was negative on those who relied heavily on lucre for babble. only that scenario has changed with cartridge holder. Current studies no longer show the overall negative effects of the bygone. Using earnings to communicate with families and friends as well as being involved in community activities has been on the rise. prejudicious effects argon chiefly experienced by battalion with less support economically and introverts and positive effects experienced by mass with good affectionate resources and extraverts. Some nation who hold up merged profit into their ordinary lives have generally benefited, but they instanter experience new social problems. These problems a re highlighted in this discussion in depth and a summary do in a table. Those net income go forrs who find communication important, have good reasonto expect that Internet has positive social force on their lives. For such people communication, including contact with neighbors, friends, and family, and participation in social groups, improves their level of social support. To them interacting with meshing gives them fulfilling personal relationships, a sense of meaning in life, and commitment to social norms with their communities. Their psychological and physiological welfare (Diener et al. 1999 Cohen and Wills 1985 Mirowsky and Ross 1989).They think through with(predicate) the use of internet for communication, they could have important positive social effects on individuals (McKenna and Bargh 2000), groups, organizations (Sproull and Kiesler 1991), and communities (Hampton and Wellman 2000), including society at large (Dertouzos 1997 Hilts). Just like the telephone did, they think broad social memory access could increase peoples social involvement, and facilitate formation of new relationships (Fischer 1992 Wellman 1996).People who are generally isolated could find new social identity and commitment (Katz and Aspden 1997). Isolated members of communities could participate in group organizations at a distance (Sproull and Kiesler 1991). Internet is also handy for political mobilization (Bonchek 1997). Whether Internet has positive or negative social impact depend upon the quality of the people online, their activities and what they give up to conk time online. Stronger social ties generally lead to better social outcomes than do weaker ties (Wellman and Wortley 1990).As we go through the discussion we find that the ease in communication that internet offers has encouraged people so oftentimes that they now spend to a greater extent time alone, talking online with strangers and very little time with their communities. Increasingly people are con necting to each different through the internet, and looked at positively, one would say internet has increased the frequence of communication among its users. in that location are pertinent issues to look at today regarding our social interaction compared with the past Has our social relation one-to-one improved or diminished? Has it provided more evidence of the difference between our virtual self and real self? Has our group interaction improved or diminished? Users of internet are socially withdrawn because they are most of the time lonely and hooked onto the net. Research has shew that the more people are online, the more they become socially isolated ( James E. Katz). The study only shows that people who are constantly online the more they become isolated from social life and that there is a relationship between depression, stress and strength in social ties created by extensive use of the internet.This on the extreme can weaken the social ties that people normally have. Robert Kraut who is a researcher in the knit and professor in the Department of Communication at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N. J. is the leading author of the study. However the finding has been seriously challenged as inadequate and lacking in rigor. The critiques say there needed to have been a control group utilize for comparison purposes and that the sample size was too small. On the contrary, computing machine experts are quoted as saying internet has greatly increased their human interaction.They say that they can now meet more people than ever before. just now sociology experts say this is more a manifestation of people in a state of denial than the truth. But the truth is that there are two diverging views about computers and its social effect on people. Hoffman and partner Tom Novak at Vanderbilt Universitys Project 2000 have for simulation have conducted a collaborate research with Georgia Institute of Technology in which they find many another(prenominal) web users find the net browsing enriching and satisfying and that they are usually left in a happy state of mind far from being depressed.Philip Aspden, executive director of the Center for Research on the Information Society, surveyed 2,500 Internet users and found no evidence of social withdrawal. The study found that online participants are no less possible to join religious, leisure or any community organized activities than people who arent online. practical(prenominal) interaction is the norm in internet activities. People using portable computers can work in one office, one project without necessarily being physically in a place.They could be some(prenominal) kilometers away and do everything together that they could do in one environment, one office, and pickle. They can talk and need meetings and discussions together. Internet has made the world look like a one local village. The issue is what is the social implication of this arrangement? Is it positive or negative s ocially? The answer is positive because the physical location can be anywhere most convenient for the individual. It can be your house / study room, supermarket or inside your car. People work better when they operate from premises of their liking.Negative because supervision, control, co-ordination and monitoring becomes difficult. People find such arrangements new and odd though not necessarily bad socially. With time we shall be used to it and our sense of belonging will change. In this discussion we try to bring into focus the positive and negative social impact of internet. However we seem to agree that internet users have more social problems than usual. They are among other things withdrawn from normal social life and in virtual solitude as is unremarkably known.It is interesting to hear what some of these people say. Please allow me to quote some experiences from people who use internet. Every time I go through the process it seems more and more like a religious ritual. Whe n I reflect that I am connected to thousands or millions of people across the world, I halt that I am seated in a solitary confine of my computer room. I admit it is a strange feeling, one that I really like to the extent that I forget the social pleasure I normally find socializing with people outside there.Sometimes I also get frightened that I am beginning to like my computer mediated communication (CMC) better than talking with most real people with whom I come into daily contact look to face. Though I find it sad to say, I have never enjoyed serious discussions before where people say what is in their heart. Social opportunities and even academic opportunities for such discussions are dwindling. Our culture has become more and more trivial and superficial. Through CMC people can find intellectual stimulation. It is easily available and comfortable.But the human nip is more natural and more satisfying. We are social animals and we need to meet and chart. Intellectualism has its time just as social life also has its time. The other negative aspect of internet is privatization which was introduced by Marshall McLuhan. This theory states that as entertainment and information becomes readily available to people, they are less likely to seek them outside their homes. As that happens, social interaction is becoming less and less frequent. We can call for the people to talk to and use special words and mode of communication.Soon we shall be out of touch with the real world where we have different type of people needing different types of communication. My entertainment, amusement, and even communication have become private rather than public. Family people have very little time for each other because they spend all that time on the net. The young ones are the most affected. During the day, they are out in school and their parents are out for work. When they come home they cannot meet either, because everybody is busy with internet. When will they talk or lea rn from the parents one would ask?All that they imitate are programs from the internet, some very weird indeed. As parents we might overlook and despise the experience we got through social interaction with our peer groups and communities while we were young. It taught us to be at peace with our environment. In this environment there is richness found in regeneration. The diversity found in behavior and culture of its people. We come to be more informed that the world is made of both order and disorder and become equipped to handle both occurrences. That is how we have been molded to be strong and resilient.The world of internet is denying our children that freedom and experience. Children never play together at home and very little in school. Computer mediated communication CMC is a new phenomenon in the computer world. There are other technologies more commonly used such as e-mail and interactive chat on the internet. These modes of communication have both bad and good sides. The y have made communication, fast, easy and affordable. The physical location of the people we communicate to is no longer a barrier. We talk to people anytime anywhere by a mere touch of a button.When we play with our peers and join social clubs we meet people and friends and that is healthful for our body and mind. We are able to do some exercise which our body needs to avoid aging. We use our bodies more than our minds. To conclude my analysis on the effects of the internet talking about pornographic ideologies is no new phenomena as it is one of the high condemned vices of the internet as it is being used in all ways. Income generating activities, a source of employment to others but highly exploitative and seriously abusive in all ways, it ranges from child pornography to adult pornography.